Site Assessment

Weighted multi-criteria scoring with go / no-go recommendation.

Site name

73.8

/ 100

Conditional fit

Criteria

Adjust weight (importance) and score (this site's strength) for each criterion.

Grid power capacity & redundancy

Weight18

Score80

Fibre routes & connectivity

Weight14

Score75

Land availability & cost

Weight10

Score70

Water supply for cooling

Weight8

Score65

Seismic & flood risk

Weight10

Score85

Ambient climate (cooling load)

Weight8

Score60

Permitting & regulatory ease

Weight10

Score72

Skilled workforce nearby

Weight6

Score68

Proximity to anchor tenants

Weight8

Score78

Construction logistics & access

Weight8

Score74

Ranked contribution

Highest weighted-impact criteria first.

Grid power capacity & redundancy14.4

Fibre routes & connectivity10.5

Seismic & flood risk8.5

Permitting & regulatory ease7.2

Land availability & cost7.0

Proximity to anchor tenants6.2

Construction logistics & access5.9

Water supply for cooling5.2

Ambient climate (cooling load)4.8

Skilled workforce nearby4.1

Recommendation

Site is workable but flag lower-scoring criteria for mitigation before committing CAPEX.