Revenue & Pricing
Model MRR, ARR, IRR, NPV and payback across pricing scenarios.
Scenario comparison
Side-by-side commercial outcomes.
| Scenario | Target ARR | $/kW | ARPU/Rack | NPV | IRR | Payback | EBITDA total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base case | $29.68M | $176 | $2,061 | $69857196.55M | -8.3% | 2y | $153.5M |
| Premium pricing | $30.18M | $202.4 | $2,096 | $72363710.75M | -7.8% | 2y | $158.7M |
| Aggressive fill | $30.04M | $161.9 | $2,086 | $80082793.8M | -7.3% | 2y | $167.8M |
Revenue ramp
Annual revenue across scenarios.
Cumulative cash (payback view)
Crosses zero at payback. Includes CAPEX at t0.
Scenario editor
Tune build, commercial and pricing assumptions per scenario.
24mo
90%
3%/yr
3%/yr
5%/yr
9%
Steady MRR
$2.75M
Target ARR
$29.68M
Blended $/kW
$176
NPV
$69857196.55M
IRR
-8.3%
Payback
2y
Pricing & tenant mix
Segment-level pricing drives MRR/ARR.
Segment
Racks
kW/Rack
$/kW·mo
XCs/Rack
$ XC/mo
P&L projection
Revenue, OPEX and EBITDA over the horizon.
AI commercial narrative
Auto-generated comparison across scenarios.
Comparing 3 pricing scenarios. Aggressive fill delivers the highest NPV at $80082793.8M with IRR -7.3%.
Base case reaches payback fastest at year 2 (target ARR $29.68M, blended $176/kW).
Target ARR ranges from $29.68M to $30.18M depending on pricing and occupancy assumptions.
Sensitivity: a 5% pricing uplift on the dominant segment typically moves NPV by 8–12% — duplicate a scenario and test the swing.